Application and service context aware cell selection

ABSTRACT

This disclosure relates to techniques for performing application context aware cell selection in a wireless communication system. A wireless device may determine a current location of the wireless device. The wireless device may determine cells associated with the current location of the wireless device. Application context based metric information may be determined for the cells associated with the current location of the wireless device. The wireless device may determine a cell with which to associate from the cells associated with the current location of the wireless device based at least in part on the application context based metric information.

FIELD

The present application relates to wireless communications, and moreparticularly to systems, apparatuses, and methods for performingapplication and service context aware cell selection in a wirelesscommunication system.

DESCRIPTION OF THE RELATED ART

Wireless communication systems are rapidly growing in usage. In recentyears, wireless devices such as smart phones and tablet computers havebecome increasingly sophisticated. In addition to supporting telephonecalls, many mobile devices (i.e., user equipment devices or UEs) nowprovide access to the internet, email, text messaging, and navigationusing the global positioning system (GPS), and are capable of operatingsophisticated applications that utilize these functionalities.Additionally, there exist numerous different wireless communicationtechnologies and standards. Some examples of wireless communicationstandards include GSM, UMTS (associated with, for example, WCDMA orTD-SCDMA air interfaces), LTE, LTE Advanced (LTE-A), NR, HSPA, 3GPP2CDMA2000 (e.g., 1×RTT, 1×EV-DO, HRPD, eHRPD), IEEE 802.11 (WLAN orWi-Fi), BLUETOOTH™, etc.

The ever-increasing number of features and functionality introduced inwireless communication devices also creates a continuous need forimprovement in both wireless communications and in wirelesscommunication devices. In particular, it is important to ensure theaccuracy of transmitted and received signals through user equipment (UE)devices, e.g., through wireless devices such as cellular phones, basestations and relay stations used in wireless cellular communications. Inaddition, increasing the functionality of a UE device can place asignificant strain on the battery life of the UE device. Thus it is veryimportant to also reduce power requirements in UE device designs whileallowing the UE device to maintain good transmit and receive abilitiesfor improved communications. Accordingly, improvements in the field aredesired.

SUMMARY

Embodiments are presented herein of apparatuses, systems, and methodsfor performing application and service context aware cell selection in awireless communication system.

According to the techniques described herein, a wireless device mayobtain cell performance information for various application contextbased metrics and/or various other possible metrics for cells in thevicinity of the wireless device. The cell performance information may bebased on historical performance information between the wireless deviceand those cells, and/or may be based on crowdsourced aggregated data,among various possibilities. In some instances, the cell performanceinformation for a cell may depend on the cell signal strength and/orquality measured by the wireless device. The wireless device may alsoobtain information regarding other cell characteristics, potentiallyincluding information regarding certain cell configuration settings,which may also be based at least in part on historical performanceinformation (e.g., from the wireless device's direct experience and/orbased on crowdsourced aggregated data).

Based on this cell information for the cells in the vicinity of thewireless device, and the current application, service, and/or devicecontext characteristics of the wireless device, the wireless device mayselect a cell with which to associate. This may include selecting a cellthat meets any configured device context based criteria, with priorityand/or bias in the cell selection towards cells with better scores,rates, or other indicators in application context based metricsprioritized by the current application and/or service context of thewireless device.

Performing cell selection in such a manner may increase the likelihoodthat the cell selected will provide suitable and potentially the bestavailable service for the specific application and device context of thewireless device at any given time, at least according to someembodiments.

Note that the techniques described herein may be implemented in and/orused with a number of different types of devices, including but notlimited to base stations, access points, cellular phones, portable mediaplayers, tablet computers, wearable devices, unmanned aerial vehicles,unmanned aerial controllers, automobiles and/or motorized vehicles, andvarious other computing devices.

This Summary is intended to provide a brief overview of some of thesubject matter described in this document. Accordingly, it will beappreciated that the above-described features are merely examples andshould not be construed to narrow the scope or spirit of the subjectmatter described herein in any way. Other features, aspects, andadvantages of the subject matter described herein will become apparentfrom the following Detailed Description, Figures, and Claims.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

A better understanding of the present subject matter can be obtainedwhen the following detailed description of various embodiments isconsidered in conjunction with the following drawings, in which:

FIG. 1 illustrates an exemplary (and simplified) wireless communicationsystem, according to some embodiments;

FIG. 2 illustrates an exemplary base station in communication with anexemplary wireless user equipment (UE) device, according to someembodiments;

FIG. 3 illustrates an exemplary block diagram of a UE, according to someembodiments;

FIG. 4 illustrates an exemplary block diagram of a base station,according to some embodiments;

FIG. 5 is a flowchart diagram illustrating aspects of an exemplarypossible method for performing application and service context awarecell selection in a wireless communication system, according to someembodiments;

FIG. 6 illustrates aspects of an exemplary possible framework forperforming application and service context aware cell selection in awireless communication system, according to some embodiments;

FIG. 7 illustrates exemplary possible cell information for cells underconsideration for cell selection in an application and service contextaware cell selection process, according to some embodiments;

FIGS. 8A-8B illustrate exemplary aspects of possible cell filteringtechniques that can be used in an application and service context awarecell selection process, according to some embodiments;

FIGS. 9-11 illustrate exemplary aspects of a possible cell selectionprocess in which application and service context impacts cell selection,according to some embodiments;

FIG. 12 is a table illustrating various possible cell characteristicsthat can be used in an application and service context aware cellselection process, according to some embodiments;

FIG. 13 illustrates exemplary aspects of a possible set of cellinformation for the cell characteristics illustrated in FIG. 12 ,including at least some different values for different RSRP/SINRregions, that can be used in an application and service context awarecell selection process, according to some embodiments; and

FIG. 14 is a flowchart diagram illustrating exemplary aspects of apossible cell selection process that considers application and servicecontext, according to some embodiments.

While features described herein are susceptible to various modificationsand alternative forms, specific embodiments thereof are shown by way ofexample in the drawings and are herein described in detail. It should beunderstood, however, that the drawings and detailed description theretoare not intended to be limiting to the particular form disclosed, but onthe contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalentsand alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the subjectmatter as defined by the appended claims.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Acronyms

Various acronyms are used throughout the present disclosure. Definitionsof the most prominently used acronyms that may appear throughout thepresent disclosure are provided below:

UE: User Equipment

RF: Radio Frequency

BS: Base Station

GSM: Global System for Mobile Communication

UMTS: Universal Mobile Telecommunication System

LTE: Long Term Evolution

NR: New Radio

TX: Transmission/Transmit

RX: Reception/Receive

RAT: Radio Access Technology

RSRP: Reference Signal Received Power

RSRQ: Reference Signal Received Quality

SINR: Signal to Interference plus Noise Ratio

RRC: Radio Resource Control

QoS: Quality of Service

Terms

The following is a glossary of terms that may appear in the presentdisclosure:

Memory Medium—Any of various types of non-transitory memory devices orstorage devices. The term “memory medium” is intended to include aninstallation medium, e.g., a CD-ROM, floppy disks, or tape device; acomputer system memory or random access memory such as DRAM, DDR RAM,SRAM, EDO RAM, Rambus RAM, etc.; a non-volatile memory such as a Flash,magnetic media, e.g., a hard drive, or optical storage; registers, orother similar types of memory elements, etc. The memory medium maycomprise other types of non-transitory memory as well or combinationsthereof. In addition, the memory medium may be located in a firstcomputer system in which the programs are executed, or may be located ina second different computer system which connects to the first computersystem over a network, such as the Internet. In the latter instance, thesecond computer system may provide program instructions to the firstcomputer system for execution. The term “memory medium” may include twoor more memory mediums which may reside in different locations, e.g., indifferent computer systems that are connected over a network. The memorymedium may store program instructions (e.g., embodied as computerprograms) that may be executed by one or more processors.

Carrier Medium—a memory medium as described above, as well as a physicaltransmission medium, such as a bus, network, and/or other physicaltransmission medium that conveys signals such as electrical,electromagnetic, or digital signals.

Computer System (or Computer)—any of various types of computing orprocessing systems, including a personal computer system (PC), mainframecomputer system, workstation, network appliance, Internet appliance,personal digital assistant (PDA), television system, grid computingsystem, or other device or combinations of devices. In general, the term“computer system” may be broadly defined to encompass any device (orcombination of devices) having at least one processor that executesinstructions from a memory medium.

User Equipment (UE) (or “UE Device”)— any of various types of computersystems or devices that are mobile or portable and that perform wirelesscommunications. Examples of UE devices include mobile telephones orsmart phones (e.g., iPhone™, Android™-based phones), tablet computers(e.g., iPad™, Samsung Galaxy™), portable gaming devices (e.g., NintendoDS™, PlayStation Portable™, Gameboy Advance™, iPhone™), wearable devices(e.g., smart watch, smart glasses), laptops, PDAs, portable Internetdevices, music players, data storage devices, other handheld devices,automobiles and/or motor vehicles, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs)(e.g., drones), UAV controllers (UACs), etc. In general, the term “UE”or “UE device” can be broadly defined to encompass any electronic,computing, and/or telecommunications device (or combination of devices)which is easily transported by a user and capable of wirelesscommunication.

Wireless Device—any of various types of computer systems or devices thatperform wireless communications. A wireless device can be portable (ormobile) or may be stationary or fixed at a certain location. A UE is anexample of a wireless device.

Communication Device—any of various types of computer systems or devicesthat perform communications, where the communications can be wired orwireless. A communication device can be portable (or mobile) or may bestationary or fixed at a certain location. A wireless device is anexample of a communication device. A UE is another example of acommunication device.

Base Station (BS)— The term “Base Station” has the full breadth of itsordinary meaning, and at least includes a wireless communication stationinstalled at a fixed location and used to communicate as part of awireless telephone system or radio system.

Processing Element (or Processor)—refers to various elements orcombinations of elements that are capable of performing a function in adevice, e.g., in a user equipment device or in a cellular networkdevice. Processing elements may include, for example: processors andassociated memory, portions or circuits of individual processor cores,entire processor cores, processor arrays, circuits such as an ASIC(Application Specific Integrated Circuit), programmable hardwareelements such as a field programmable gate array (FPGA), as well any ofvarious combinations of the above.

Wi-Fi—The term “Wi-Fi” has the full breadth of its ordinary meaning, andat least includes a wireless communication network or RAT that isserviced by wireless LAN (WLAN) access points and which providesconnectivity through these access points to the Internet. Most modernWi-Fi networks (or WLAN networks) are based on IEEE 802.11 standards andare marketed under the name “Wi-Fi”. A Wi-Fi (WLAN) network is differentfrom a cellular network.

Automatically—refers to an action or operation performed by a computersystem (e.g., software executed by the computer system) or device (e.g.,circuitry, programmable hardware elements, ASICs, etc.), without userinput directly specifying or performing the action or operation. Thusthe term “automatically” is in contrast to an operation being manuallyperformed or specified by the user, where the user provides input todirectly perform the operation. An automatic procedure may be initiatedby input provided by the user, but the subsequent actions that areperformed “automatically” are not specified by the user, i.e., are notperformed “manually”, where the user specifies each action to perform.For example, a user filling out an electronic form by selecting eachfield and providing input specifying information (e.g., by typinginformation, selecting check boxes, radio selections, etc.) is fillingout the form manually, even though the computer system must update theform in response to the user actions. The form may be automaticallyfilled out by the computer system where the computer system (e.g.,software executing on the computer system) analyzes the fields of theform and fills in the form without any user input specifying the answersto the fields. As indicated above, the user may invoke the automaticfilling of the form, but is not involved in the actual filling of theform (e.g., the user is not manually specifying answers to fields butrather they are being automatically completed). The presentspecification provides various examples of operations beingautomatically performed in response to actions the user has taken.

Configured to—Various components may be described as “configured to”perform a task or tasks. In such contexts, “configured to” is a broadrecitation generally meaning “having structure that” performs the taskor tasks during operation. As such, the component can be configured toperform the task even when the component is not currently performingthat task (e.g., a set of electrical conductors may be configured toelectrically connect a module to another module, even when the twomodules are not connected). In some contexts, “configured to” may be abroad recitation of structure generally meaning “having circuitry that”performs the task or tasks during operation. As such, the component canbe configured to perform the task even when the component is notcurrently on. In general, the circuitry that forms the structurecorresponding to “configured to” may include hardware circuits.

Various components may be described as performing a task or tasks, forconvenience in the description. Such descriptions should be interpretedas including the phrase “configured to.” Reciting a component that isconfigured to perform one or more tasks is expressly intended not toinvoke 35 U.S.C. § 112, paragraph six, interpretation for thatcomponent.

FIGS. 1 and 2 —Exemplary Communication System

FIG. 1 illustrates an exemplary (and simplified) wireless communicationsystem in which aspects of this disclosure may be implemented, accordingto some embodiments. It is noted that the system of FIG. 1 is merely oneexample of a possible system, and embodiments may be implemented in anyof various systems, as desired.

As shown, the exemplary wireless communication system includes a basestation 102 which communicates over a transmission medium with one ormore (e.g., an arbitrary number of) user devices 106A, 106B, etc.through 106N. Each of the user devices may be referred to herein as a“user equipment” (UE) or UE device. Thus, the user devices 106 arereferred to as UEs or UE devices.

The base station 102 may be a base transceiver station (BTS) or cellsite, and may include hardware and/or software that enables wirelesscommunication with the UEs 106A through 106N. If the base station 102 isimplemented in the context of LTE, it may alternately be referred to asan ‘eNodeB’ or ‘eNB’. If the base station 102 is implemented in thecontext of 5G NR, it may alternately be referred to as a ‘gNodeB’ or‘gNB’. The base station 102 may also be equipped to communicate with anetwork 100 (e.g., a core network of a cellular service provider, atelecommunication network such as a public switched telephone network(PSTN), and/or the Internet, among various possibilities). Thus, thebase station 102 may facilitate communication among the user devicesand/or between the user devices and the network 100. The communicationarea (or coverage area) of the base station may be referred to as a“cell.” As also used herein, from the perspective of UEs, a base stationmay sometimes be considered as representing the network insofar asuplink and downlink communications of the UE are concerned. Thus, a UEcommunicating with one or more base stations in the network may also beinterpreted as the UE communicating with the network.

The base station 102 and the user devices may be configured tocommunicate over the transmission medium using any of various radioaccess technologies (RATs), also referred to as wireless communicationtechnologies, or telecommunication standards, such as GSM, UMTS (WCDMA),LTE, LTE-Advanced (LTE-A), LAA/LTE-U, 5G NR, 3GPP2 CDMA2000 (e.g.,1×RTT, 1×EV-DO, HRPD, eHRPD), Wi-Fi, etc.

Base station 102 and other similar base stations operating according tothe same or a different cellular communication standard may thus beprovided as one or more networks of cells, which may provide continuousor nearly continuous overlapping service to UE 106 and similar devicesover a geographic area via one or more cellular communication standards.

Note that a UE 106 may be capable of communicating using multiplewireless communication standards. For example, a UE 106 might beconfigured to communicate using either or both of a 3GPP cellularcommunication standard or a 3GPP2 cellular communication standard. Insome embodiments, the UE 106 may be configured to perform techniques forperforming application and service context aware cell selection in awireless communication system, such as according to the various methodsdescribed herein. The UE 106 might also or alternatively be configuredto communicate using WLAN, BLUETOOTH™, one or more global navigationalsatellite systems (GNSS, e.g., GPS or GLONASS), one and/or more mobiletelevision broadcasting standards (e.g., ATSC-M/H), etc. Othercombinations of wireless communication standards (including more thantwo wireless communication standards) are also possible.

FIG. 2 illustrates an exemplary user equipment 106 (e.g., one of thedevices 106A through 106N) in communication with the base station 102,according to some embodiments. The UE 106 may be a device with wirelessnetwork connectivity such as a mobile phone, a hand-held device, awearable device, a computer or a tablet, an unmanned aerial vehicle(UAV), an unmanned aerial controller (UAC), an automobile, or virtuallyany type of wireless device. The UE 106 may include a processor(processing element) that is configured to execute program instructionsstored in memory. The UE 106 may perform any of the method embodimentsdescribed herein by executing such stored instructions. Alternatively,or in addition, the UE 106 may include a programmable hardware elementsuch as an FPGA (field-programmable gate array), an integrated circuit,and/or any of various other possible hardware components that areconfigured to perform (e.g., individually or in combination) any of themethod embodiments described herein, or any portion of any of the methodembodiments described herein. The UE 106 may be configured tocommunicate using any of multiple wireless communication protocols. Forexample, the UE 106 may be configured to communicate using two or moreof CDMA2000, LTE, LTE-A, 5G NR, WLAN, or GNSS. Other combinations ofwireless communication standards are also possible.

The UE 106 may include one or more antennas for communicating using oneor more wireless communication protocols according to one or more RATstandards. In some embodiments, the UE 106 may share one or more partsof a receive chain and/or transmit chain between multiple wirelesscommunication standards. The shared radio may include a single antenna,or may include multiple antennas (e.g., for MIMO) for performingwireless communications. In general, a radio may include any combinationof a baseband processor, analog RF signal processing circuitry (e.g.,including filters, mixers, oscillators, amplifiers, etc.), or digitalprocessing circuitry (e.g., for digital modulation as well as otherdigital processing). Similarly, the radio may implement one or morereceive and transmit chains using the aforementioned hardware.

In some embodiments, the UE 106 may include separate transmit and/orreceive chains (e.g., including separate antennas and other radiocomponents) for each wireless communication protocol with which it isconfigured to communicate. As a further possibility, the UE 106 mayinclude one or more radios that are shared between multiple wirelesscommunication protocols, and one or more radios that are usedexclusively by a single wireless communication protocol. For example,the UE 106 may include a shared radio for communicating using either ofLTE or CDMA2000 1×RTT (or LTE or NR, or LTE or GSM), and separate radiosfor communicating using each of Wi-Fi and BLUETOOTH™. Otherconfigurations are also possible.

FIG. 3 —Block Diagram of an Exemplary UE Device

FIG. 3 illustrates a block diagram of an exemplary UE 106, according tosome embodiments. As shown, the UE 106 may include a system on chip(SOC) 300, which may include portions for various purposes. For example,as shown, the SOC 300 may include processor(s) 302 which may executeprogram instructions for the UE 106 and display circuitry 304 which mayperform graphics processing and provide display signals to the display360. The SOC 300 may also include sensor circuitry 370, which mayinclude components for sensing or measuring any of a variety of possiblecharacteristics or parameters of the UE 106. For example, the sensorcircuitry 370 may include motion sensing circuitry configured to detectmotion of the UE 106, for example using a gyroscope, accelerometer,and/or any of various other motion sensing components. As anotherpossibility, the sensor circuitry 370 may include one or moretemperature sensing components, for example for measuring thetemperature of each of one or more antenna panels and/or othercomponents of the UE 106. Any of various other possible types of sensorcircuitry may also or alternatively be included in UE 106, as desired.The processor(s) 302 may also be coupled to memory management unit (MMU)340, which may be configured to receive addresses from the processor(s)302 and translate those addresses to locations in memory (e.g., memory306, read only memory (ROM) 350, NAND flash memory 310) and/or to othercircuits or devices, such as the display circuitry 304, radio 330,connector I/F 320, and/or display 360. The MMU 340 may be configured toperform memory protection and page table translation or set up. In someembodiments, the MMU 340 may be included as a portion of theprocessor(s) 302.

As shown, the SOC 300 may be coupled to various other circuits of the UE106. For example, the UE 106 may include various types of memory (e.g.,including NAND flash 310), a connector interface 320 (e.g., for couplingto a computer system, dock, charging station, etc.), the display 360,and wireless communication circuitry 330 (e.g., for LTE, LTE-A, NR,CDMA2000, BLUETOOTH™, Wi-Fi, GPS, etc.). The UE device 106 may includeat least one antenna (e.g. 335 a), and possibly multiple antennas (e.g.illustrated by antennas 335 a and 335 b), for performing wirelesscommunication with base stations and/or other devices. Antennas 335 aand 335 b are shown by way of example, and UE device 106 may includefewer or more antennas. Overall, the one or more antennas arecollectively referred to as antenna 335. For example, the UE device 106may use antenna 335 to perform the wireless communication with the aidof radio circuitry 330. As noted above, the UE may be configured tocommunicate wirelessly using multiple wireless communication standardsin some embodiments.

The UE 106 may include hardware and software components for implementingmethods for the UE 106 to perform techniques for application and servicecontext aware cell selection in a wireless communication system, such asdescribed further subsequently herein. The processor(s) 302 of the UEdevice 106 may be configured to implement part or all of the methodsdescribed herein, e.g., by executing program instructions stored on amemory medium (e.g., a non-transitory computer-readable memory medium).In other embodiments, processor(s) 302 may be configured as aprogrammable hardware element, such as an FPGA (Field Programmable GateArray), or as an ASIC (Application Specific Integrated Circuit).Furthermore, processor(s) 302 may be coupled to and/or may interoperatewith other components as shown in FIG. 3 , to perform techniques forapplication and service context aware cell selection in a wirelesscommunication system according to various embodiments disclosed herein.Processor(s) 302 may also implement various other applications and/orend-user applications running on UE 106.

In some embodiments, radio 330 may include separate controllersdedicated to controlling communications for various respective RATstandards. For example, as shown in FIG. 3 , radio 330 may include aWi-Fi controller 352, a cellular controller (e.g. LTE and/or LTE-Acontroller) 354, and BLUETOOTH™ controller 356, and in at least someembodiments, one or more or all of these controllers may be implementedas respective integrated circuits (ICs or chips, for short) incommunication with each other and with SOC 300 (and more specificallywith processor(s) 302). For example, Wi-Fi controller 352 maycommunicate with cellular controller 354 over a cell-ISM link or WCIinterface, and/or BLUETOOTH™ controller 356 may communicate withcellular controller 354 over a cell-ISM link, etc. While three separatecontrollers are illustrated within radio 330, other embodiments havefewer or more similar controllers for various different RATs that may beimplemented in UE device 106.

Further, embodiments in which controllers may implement functionalityassociated with multiple radio access technologies are also envisioned.For example, according to some embodiments, the cellular controller 354may, in addition to hardware and/or software components for performingcellular communication, include hardware and/or software components forperforming one or more activities associated with Wi-Fi, such as Wi-Fipreamble detection, and/or generation and transmission of Wi-Fi physicallayer preamble signals.

FIG. 4 —Block Diagram of an Exemplary Base Station

FIG. 4 illustrates a block diagram of an exemplary base station 102,according to some embodiments. It is noted that the base station of FIG.4 is merely one example of a possible base station. As shown, the basestation 102 may include processor(s) 404 which may execute programinstructions for the base station 102. The processor(s) 404 may also becoupled to memory management unit (MMU) 440, which may be configured toreceive addresses from the processor(s) 404 and translate thoseaddresses to locations in memory (e.g., memory 460 and read only memory(ROM) 450) or to other circuits or devices.

The base station 102 may include at least one network port 470. Thenetwork port 470 may be configured to couple to a telephone network andprovide a plurality of devices, such as UE devices 106, access to thetelephone network as described above in FIGS. 1 and 2 . The network port470 (or an additional network port) may also or alternatively beconfigured to couple to a cellular network, e.g., a core network of acellular service provider. The core network may provide mobility relatedservices and/or other services to a plurality of devices, such as UEdevices 106. In some cases, the network port 470 may couple to atelephone network via the core network, and/or the core network mayprovide a telephone network (e.g., among other UE devices serviced bythe cellular service provider).

The base station 102 may include at least one antenna 434, and possiblymultiple antennas. The antenna(s) 434 may be configured to operate as awireless transceiver and may be further configured to communicate withUE devices 106 via radio 430. The antenna(s) 434 communicates with theradio 430 via communication chain 432. Communication chain 432 may be areceive chain, a transmit chain or both. The radio 430 may be designedto communicate via various wireless telecommunication standards,including, but not limited to, NR, LTE, LTE-A WCDMA, CDMA2000, etc. Theprocessor 404 of the base station 102 may be configured to implementand/or support implementation of part or all of the methods describedherein, e.g., by executing program instructions stored on a memorymedium (e.g., a non-transitory computer-readable memory medium).Alternatively, the processor 404 may be configured as a programmablehardware element, such as an FPGA (Field Programmable Gate Array), or asan ASIC (Application Specific Integrated Circuit), or a combinationthereof. In the case of certain RATs, for example Wi-Fi, base station102 may be designed as an access point (AP), in which case network port470 may be implemented to provide access to a wide area network and/orlocal area network (s), e.g., it may include at least one Ethernet port,and radio 430 may be designed to communicate according to the Wi-Fistandard.

FIG. 5 —Application and Service Context Aware Cell Selection

Cell selection and re-selection may commonly be performed in a usercontext agnostic manner. For example, in at least some cellularcommunication systems, network configured thresholds may be used inconjunction with various cell measurements to control how and when cellselection and re-selection is performed. However, as network deploymentsbecome more dense and diverse (e.g., including cells of different sizesand/or that are intended to cater to different types of servicepreferences, among various possibilities), there may be an increasingopportunity for user experience to be improved by introducingapplication, service, and/or wireless device context awareness whenperforming cell selection and cell re-selection. For example, suchtechniques may have the potential to improve the Quality of Service(QoS) experienced for the specific application(s) or service(s) activeat the wireless device, by increasing the likelihood that the cell withwhich a wireless device associates can provide the best performance forthe specific needs or preferences of the specific application(s) orservice(s) active at the wireless device at that particular time.

Thus, it may be beneficial to specify techniques for supportingapplication and service context aware cell selection. To illustrate onesuch set of possible techniques, FIG. 5 is a flowchart diagramillustrating a method for performing application and service contextaware cell selection in a wireless communication system, at leastaccording to some embodiments.

Aspects of the method of FIG. 5 may be implemented by a wireless device,e.g., in conjunction with one or more cellular base stations, such as aUE 106 and a BS 102 illustrated in and described with respect to variousof the Figures herein, or more generally in conjunction with any of thecomputer circuitry, systems, devices, elements, or components shown inthe above Figures, among others, as desired. For example, a processor(and/or other hardware) of such a device may be configured to cause thedevice to perform any combination of the illustrated method elementsand/or other method elements.

Note that while at least some elements of the method of FIG. 5 aredescribed in a manner relating to the use of communication techniquesand/or features associated with 3GPP and/or NR specification documents,such description is not intended to be limiting to the disclosure, andaspects of the method of FIG. 5 may be used in any suitable wirelesscommunication system, as desired. In various embodiments, some of theelements of the methods shown may be performed concurrently, in adifferent order than shown, may be substituted for by other methodelements, or may be omitted. Additional method elements may also beperformed as desired. As shown, the method of FIG. 5 may operate asfollows.

In 502, the wireless device may determine a current location of thewireless device. The current location may be determined using any of avariety of techniques, for example including use of one or more globalnavigational satellite systems (e.g., GPS, GLONASS, etc.) to determine alatitude and longitude coordinate set for the wireless device.Additionally, or alternatively, the location determination could bebased at least in part on communication between the wireless device andone or more cellular base stations, for example using cellidentification information for the cellular base station(s) and storedinformation indicating coordinates associated with the cellidentification information. Other techniques are also possible.

In 504, the wireless device may determine one or more cells associatedwith the current location of the wireless device. At least according tosome embodiments, the wireless device may store information identifyingcells associated with various locations. For example, the locationinformation for the cells may include cell centroid coordinates and cellradius information, which may allow the wireless device to determinewhether a given set of coordinates may be within the typical or possiblecommunication range of the cell. Other formats for associating cellswith locations are also possible. Using such information, the wirelessdevice may determine a set of cells whose locations are in the vicinityof the current location of the wireless device, for example such thatthose cells may be considered as potential cells to associate with bythe wireless device.

In 506, the wireless device may determine cell characteristics for thecells associated with the current location of the wireless device. Thecell characteristics may include any of a variety of cellcharacteristics. Some of the cell characteristics may relate to theconfiguration parameters of the cell. For example, the cellcharacteristics could include indicators for whether a cell has enabledcell ciphering, whether connected discontinuous reception (CDRX) isenabled at a cell (and/or indicating the status of one or more otherpower consumption related configuration parameters), or whether the cellsupports voice over packet switched (VoPS) communication. The cellcharacteristics could additionally or alternatively include any ofvarious fundamental characteristics of a cell, such as a frequency onwhich the cell is deployed, a RAT of the cell, a network (e.g., PLMN)associated with the cell, etc.

In at least some embodiments, the cell characteristics may include oneor more performance related cell characteristics, which may bedetermined based on measured historical performance. For example, thecell characteristics could include a cell accessibility metric (e.g.,which may be based on how often attempts to access a cell fail accordingto the historical performance information, as one possibility), a cellretainability metric (e.g., which may be based on how often anestablished radio link with a cell fails and/or how often additionalcell addition (e.g., through carrier aggregation (CA), or dualconnectivity (DC)) fails according to the historical performanceinformation, as one possibility), and/or a cell stability metric (e.g.,which may be based on how often data link stalls and/or device resetsoccur for a cell according to the historical performance information, asone possibility), among various possibilities.

The cell characteristics could include one or more application contextbased metrics for a cell, at least according to some embodiments. Forexample, the cell characteristics could include a cell throughput scoremetric (e.g., which may be particularly relevant for applicationcontexts in which high throughput is particularly important), a celllatency score metric (e.g., which may be particularly relevant forapplication contexts in which low latency is particularly important),and/or a cell voice call quality score metric (e.g., which may beparticularly relevant for application contexts in which voice callquality is particularly important). A cell's scores for such metrics maybe based on historical performance information for the cell. Forexample, the cell throughput score metric may be based on a combinationsome or all of average downlink throughput, average uplink throughput,high percentile uplink and/or downlink throughput values (e.g., 90%), orlow percentile uplink and/or downlink throughput values (e.g., 10%).Similarly, the cell latency score metric may be based on a combinationsome or all of average latency, a high percentile latency value (e.g.,90%), or a low percentile latency value (e.g., 10%). The voice callquality score may be based on a voice call setup success rate and/or avoice call drop rate. Note that other application context basedscores/metrics are also possible, and/or that the application contextbased scores/metrics described herein may be determined in other ways,according to various embodiments.

Some or all of the cell characteristics for the cells associated withthe current location of the wireless device may be determined based atleast in part on aggregated crowdsourced data. For example, it may bepossible that multiple wireless devices measure and store and/or reporthistorical performance information that can be used to calculate some orall of the cell characteristics. Such information may be reported to anaggregating entity (e.g., a server or group of servers, as onepossibility) that determines cell characteristics for cells based on theaggregated crowdsourced historical performance information reported tothe aggregating entity. The determined cell characteristics may beprovided from the aggregating entity (e.g., possibly by way of one ormore intermediate steps) to the wireless device, and may in turn be usedby the wireless device in accordance with the method of FIG. 5 and/orfor any of various other possible purposes.

Additionally, or alternatively, some or all of the cell characteristicsfor the cells associated with the current location of the wirelessdevice may be determined based at least in part on historical cellperformance between the wireless device and those cells. For example, itmay be possible that the wireless device measures and stores historicalperformance information that can be used (e.g., using on-devicelearning) to calculate some or all of the cell characteristics, and/orto modify cell characteristic information determined based oncrowdsourced aggregated data to more closely match the experiencedperformance of a cell for the wireless device in particular.

At least in some embodiments, some or all of the cell characteristicsfor the cells associated with the current location of the wirelessdevice may be determined based at least in part on signal strengthand/or quality measurements for the one cells associated with thecurrent location of the wireless device. For example, in some instances,multiple cell signal strength/quality regions (e.g., with differentsignal strength thresholds differentiating the regions) may be definedfor at least some cells, which may have different associated values forsome or all of the cell characteristics for those cells. Thus, for eachcell in the vicinity of the wireless device, the signal strength/qualityof the cell may inform in which signal strength/quality region the cellis for the wireless device, and correspondingly the cell characteristicsfor the cell associated with that signal strength/quality region may bedetermined as the applicable cell characteristics for the cell.

In 508, the wireless device may determine a cell with which to associatebased at least in part on the determined cell characteristics for thecells associated with the current location of the wireless device. Thedetermination of the cell with which to associate may be performed inresponse to receiving a service request from an application executing onthe wireless device, at least in some embodiments. For example, thewireless device may determine to establish a radio resource control(RRC) connection with a cellular base station in order to support a datalink with a cellular network to communicate data on behalf of theapplication that triggered the service request, and may select the cellwith which to associate in order to establish the RRC connection on theselected cell, at least according to some embodiments. Alternatively, itmay also be possible that the determination of the cell with which toassociate is an initial cell selection while in idle mode, or a cellre-selection (e.g., due to wireless device mobility, or for any of avariety of other possible reasons).

For a scenario in which the cell association is triggered by anapplication service request, it may be the case that the wireless devicedetermines an application type, or a service type, or otherwisedetermines application context information for the service request. Theapplication context information may be used to determine which cellcharacteristic(s) to prioritize when selecting the cell with which toassociate. For example, the wireless device may determine whether toprioritize one of throughput, latency, or voice call quality, and/oranother characteristic, for the cellular link that will serve theapplication service request. As another possibility, the wireless devicemay determine prioritization weights for each application context basedmetric and/or one or more other cell characteristics based on the natureof the application service request (e.g., as in the soft assignment casein FIG. 14 ). The determined application context information may be usedwhen selection cell with which to associate. For example, if a neighborcell has a higher score (possibly by at least a configured threshold) inthe application context based metric that the wireless device hasdetermined to prioritize than a current serving cell (and otherwisemeets one or more criteria for potential association), the wirelessdevice may determine to re-select to that neighbor cell (noting that theUE's cell neighborhood list may be determined solely by the UE itself,e.g., as described with respect to step 504, at least according to someembodiments), e.g., in order to establish the RRC connection on the cellthat is expected to provide better performance for the cellcharacteristic(s) considered most relevant to the currentapplication/service context of the wireless device, which may in turnresult in actual better performance for the application that triggeredthe application service request than if the RRC connection wereestablished on the serving cell without performing cell re-selection.

In some instances, the cell selection may additionally or alternativelybe performed based at least in part on wireless device contextinformation. For example, certain cells may be filtered out frompotentially being selected for association based on not meeting certainwireless device context specific criteria. As one such possibility,depending on a battery/power context of the device (e.g., whether thewireless device is currently charging, a current battery reserve levelof the wireless device, a current power consumption mode of the wirelessdevice, a current battery drain rate of the wireless device, etc.),certain cells may (or may not) be filtered out based on one or morepower consumption related cell characteristics (e.g., whether they haveCDRX enabled or not). As another such possibility, depending on aprivacy context for the wireless device (e.g., based on a userconfigured privacy preference setting or any of various otherconsiderations), certain cells may (or may not) be filtered out based onone or more privacy related cell characteristics (e.g., whetherciphering is enabled). Other aspects of wireless device context andcorresponding filtering mechanisms are also possible.

Associating with the selected cell by the wireless device may includeestablishing a wireless link with a cellular base station. According tosome embodiments, the wireless link may include a cellular linkaccording to 5G NR. For example, the wireless device may establish asession with an AMF entity of the cellular network by way of one or moregNBs that provide radio access to the cellular network. As anotherpossibility, the wireless link may include a cellular link according toLTE. For example, the wireless device may establish a session with amobility management entity of the cellular network by way of an eNB thatprovides radio access to the cellular network. Other types of cellularlinks are also possible, and the cellular network may also oralternatively operate according to another cellular communicationtechnology (e.g., UMTS, CDMA2000, GSM, etc.), according to variousembodiments.

Establishing the wireless link may include establishing a RRC connectionwith a serving cellular base station, at least according to someembodiments. For example, when the cell association is performed basedon an application service request, the wireless device may establish aRRC connection to support the application service request. Establishingthe RRC connection may include configuring various parameters forcommunication between the wireless device and the cellular base station,establishing context information for the wireless device, and/or any ofvarious other possible features, e.g., relating to establishing an airinterface for the wireless device to perform cellular communication witha cellular network associated with the cellular base station. Afterestablishing the RRC connection, the wireless device may operate in aRRC connected state. In some instances, the RRC connection may also bereleased (e.g., after a certain period of inactivity with respect todata communication), in which case the wireless device may operate in aRRC idle state or a RRC inactive state. In some instances, the wirelessdevice may perform handover (e.g., while in RRC connected mode) or cellre-selection (e.g., while in RRC idle or RRC inactive mode) to a newserving cell, e.g., due to wireless device mobility, changing wirelessmedium conditions, changing application, service, or wireless devicecontext, and/or for any of various other possible reasons.

Thus, at least according to some embodiments, the method of FIG. 5 maybe used to perform application and service context aware cell selection.As described herein, such techniques may result in selection of a cellthat can better meet the QoS preferences or needs of any activeapplications or services than application and service context agnosticcell selection techniques, at least in some instances.

FIGS. 6-14 and Additional Information

FIGS. 6-14 illustrate further aspects that might be used in conjunctionwith the method of FIG. 5 if desired. It should be noted, however, thatthe exemplary details illustrated in and described with respect to FIGS.6-14 are not intended to be limiting to the disclosure as a whole:numerous variations and alternatives to the details provided hereinbelow are possible and should be considered within the scope of thedisclosure.

Cell selection and re-selection in at least some cellular communicationsystems may be performed based primarily on radio frequency (RF)measurements in combination with certain network configured thresholds.For example, RF signal strength and/or signal quality thresholds, and/orany of various other possible parameters or thresholds, may beconfigured by a network to dictate how often a wireless device attachedto the network is expected to perform neighbor cell measurements, whento perform cell re-selection, to which cell to re-select, and/or any ofvarious other possible cell re-selection related decisions.

With the increasing proliferation of mobile devices and the popularityof interactive applications, including in indoor and hotspot type areassuch as offices, stadiums, shopping malls, subways, etc., cellulartraffic is becoming increasingly extensive. To accommodate such trafficincreases, one approach being used by cellular network operators(carriers) may include network densification, for example in 5G andbeyond cellular network deployments, to boost network capacity. Suchdensification may be achieved using a hybrid amalgam of a variety ofcell types (e.g., microcells, picocells, femtocells, relay nodes, remoteradio heads (RRHs), etc.), which may have lower power and cost, andsmaller coverage areas than macro cells. In some instances, such cellsmay typically include millimeter wave (mmWave) cells. Another possibleaspect of such a network densification approach to accommodatingincreasing cellular traffic may include providing cells that offerdifferent service quality guarantees. For example, some such cells maybe configured to serve users that are running applications that arethroughput hungry (e.g., beamforming enabled mmWave or Wi-Fi hotspots,for example), other such cells may be configured to serve users that arerunning applications that require low latency, while still other cellsmay be designed to cater to other use cases, according to variousembodiments.

Devising a lightweight device-to-cell association process, whichmaintains the required end user Quality of Service (QoS), taking intoaccount the user's privacy and mobility needs, and which has a lowcontrol overhead, may be a particular challenge in such a highly denseand dynamic environment. For example, dense networks, both in terms ofbase stations and active users, may mean that UEs, depending on theirgeo-location, and cellular neighborhood topology and type (e.g., pico,micro, etc.), may perceive highly dynamic cellular links (e.g., due tointerference and/or reduced cell size) as well as fluctuating QoS (e.g.,due to cell load, cell configuration, cell capabilities, etc.). This maymean that the cell selection process can have a significant impact onachievable QoS.

Accordingly, it may be possible to improve on existing 3GPP defineddevice-to-cell association mechanisms, such as the approach previouslydescribed herein using RF measurements in combination with networkconfigured thresholds. Since such techniques may be network controlledand user-QoS-blind, they may be common for any user that needs toconnect to the network (e.g., as they may depend mainly or solely on UEreceived cell power and interference conditions (e.g., RSRP and SINR),regardless of the UE location, application level QoS, and privacy needs.Network side UE context aware (e.g., based on application needs and/oruser geo-location, among various possibilities) cell association andscheduling may not be possible and/or preferable in at least someinstances in view of privacy limitations (e.g., mobile devices maychoose not to or may not be allowed to share such privacy sensitiveinformation with the network). Accordingly, as one possible alternative,a UE based approach to cell selection/re-selection that considers deviceand application context information be used.

At least according to some embodiments, such an approach may make use ofhistorical cell performance measurements (e.g., which could includehistorical results from operation of the wireless device itself, and/oraggregated crowdsourced data from multiple (e.g., other) wirelessdevices). Such cell and/or location performance information may be usedto identify which of any available cells at the location of a UE isexpected to provide the best performance for the UE in view of itscurrent application and device context. At least in some instances,certain cell characteristics (which may differ based on a cell'sinstantaneous load, the type of users and traffic the cell is intendedto serve, and/or other considerations) may also be considered in thecell selection/re-selection process, such as whether a cell has cellularciphering enabled (e.g., which may impact cell selection depending onprivacy context for the UE), how power friendly a cell configuration is(e.g., which may impact cell selection depending on battery/powercontext for the UE), whether a cell operates in a spectrum portion thatmay be subject to coexistence considerations (e.g., which may impactcell selection depending on coexistence context for the UE) with otherwireless communication technologies, and/or any of various otherpossible cell characteristics.

In some embodiments, one or more scores, rates, and/or flags may beassigned to a cell, possibly per RSRP/SINR region (e.g., of a configuredset of RSRP/SINR regions), as part of such an approach to performingcell selection or re-selection. These scores/rates/flags may be designedto reflect the device's contextual awareness about the cells that are inthe vicinity of its location. The per-cell+RSRP/SINR region informationmay be designed to reflect the cellular link quality and performance inmultiple aspects.

According to some embodiments, application/service aware scores couldinclude a cell uplink (UL)/downlink (DL) throughput score, a celllatency score, and/or a cell voice call quality score. The cell UL/DLthroughput score may reflect how good a cell is at providing UL, DL, orconcurrent UL/DL, to a throughput hungry application or service. Thecell latency score may reflect how good a cell is at providing lowlatency to a low latency hungry application or service. The cell voicecall quality score may reflect how good a cell is at supporting highfidelity voice calls.

According to some embodiments, cellular link quality rates could includea cell accessibility rate, a cell retainability rate, and/or a cellstability rate. The cell accessibility rate may reflect whether a cellcan be accessed easily and reliably. The cell retainability rate mayreflect whether a cellular link can be reliably retained, once the UE isassociated with the cell, for the needed duration of the connection. Thecell stability rate may reflect the stability of a cellular link (e.g.,how likely it would be for a UE connected to that cell to reset orstall).

According to some embodiments, cellular link feature flags could includea cell power saving configuration flag, a cell ciphering configurationflag, a cell voice over packet switched (VoPS) flag, and/or a cellcoexistence flag. The cell power saving configuration flag may reflectwhether a cell's configuration is power consumption friendly or not(e.g., whether connected mode discontinuous reception (CDRX) is enabled,as one possible aspect). The cell ciphering configuration flag mayreflect whether a cell has ciphering enabled (e.g., for privacypurposes). The cell VoPS flag may reflect whether a cell is VoPS (e.g.,VoLTE and/or VoNR) capable. The cell coexistence flag may reflectwhether a cell's frequency band is or can be used in a spectrum sharingfashion with other technologies (e.g., UWB, Wi-Fi, etc.). Note that suchinformation may be valuable to UE baseband operation, for example tosupport properly instantiating the needed software and hardwareresources upfront and in a timely manner, to cope with the inferenceand/or link drop issues that could potentially result from suchcoexistence.

The scores/rates/flags for a cell may be determined based at least inpart on aggregated crowdsourced data, according to some embodiments. Forexample, key performance indicator (KPI) information, configurationstatistics, and/or other information for any number of cells interactedwith by wireless devices may be collected (with the consent of allapplicable parties), aggregated, and used to determine thescores/rates/flags for any cells for which such information can becollected. Such information may, for example, be collected fromconsenting wireless devices associated with a particular wireless devicevendor by one or more servers configured for such a purpose and used todetermine the scores/rates/flags; some or all such scores/rates/flagsmay in turn be provided to wireless devices associated with thatwireless device vendor (e.g., including at least a subset applicable tothe current location of each such wireless device), for example for usewhen performing application/service context aware cell selection orre-selection. Additionally, or alternatively, the scores/rates/flags fora cell may be determined using on device historical measurements. As onesuch possibility, a local on-device database may collect historicalmeasurements for cells visited by the wireless device, and determine QoSperception per application type. For example, throughput observed on acertain cell could be used at least in part to determine applicabilityof that cell for use for streaming applications, as one possibility.

FIG. 6 illustrates aspects of an exemplary possible framework forperforming application and service context aware cell selection in awireless communication system, according to some embodiments. In theillustrated scenario, in 602, a cell association state machine executingon a wireless device may request information indicating the currentlocation of the wireless device from a mapping application executing onthe wireless device. In 604, the mapping application may return thecurrent location information to the cell association state machine. Themapping application may obtain the current location information for thewireless device based at least in part using global navigationalsatellite system (GNSS) communication, among various possible techniquesfor determining the current location of the wireless device.

In 606, the cell association state machine may request informationregarding cells in the vicinity of the wireless device from a wirelessresource management application (e.g., an application programminginterface (API)) executing on the wireless device, e.g., by providingcoordinate information for the wireless device. In 608, the wirelessresource management application may in turn request informationindicating cells in the vicinity of the current location of the wirelessdevice from a source of stored cell location information for thewireless device, such as a cell location service API. In 610, a list ofLTE and NR cells for the current location of the wireless device may beprovided to the wireless resource management entity, which may, in 612,provide the requested information regarding cells in the vicinity of thewireless device to the cell association state machine.

In 614, the cell association state machine may requestapplication/service/configuration information (e.g., scores/rates/flags)for the cells around the wireless device from an entity storing suchcell information. The cell information may be computed at least in partusing crowdsourced telemetry feedback information aggregated frommultiple wireless device, e.g., by a centralized server, and may beprovided to the entity storing the cell information on the wirelessdevice, which may, in 616, return cell preference score andconfiguration metric information for the cells around the wirelessdevice. In 618, the cell information, including any scores/metricsobtained from the crowdsourced computation, possibly additionally withon-device learning based adjustments and/or additions from historicalcell performance results experienced by the wireless device itself, maybe provided to modem baseband of the wireless device. The modem basebandmay use this information to select a best cell with which to associate,for example based on the current application/service/device context forthe wireless device. In 620, the modem baseband may also providetelemetry feedback to the cell association state machine. The telemetryfeedback may relate to historical cell performance results experiencedby the wireless device, which may be provided to the entity performingthe crowdsourced computation of cell performance/configurationinformation, and/or used by the wireless device itself for on-devicelearning.

FIG. 7 illustrates exemplary possible cell information for cells underconsideration for cell selection in an application and service contextaware cell selection process such as the approach illustrated in anddescribed with respect to FIG. 6 , according to some embodiments. Asshown, in the illustrated scenario, various scores, rates, and flags foreach of various cells in the vicinity of a wireless device may beavailable to the wireless device to facilitate cell selection. Suchdetailed cell information may be used to determine a cell preference fora cell with which to associate, which may be biased or weighted tocertain scores/rates/flags depending on the application/service/devicecontext for the wireless device. Alternatively, such detailed cellinformation may be used to determine a cell preference for a cell withwhich to associate in a wireless device context free manner, e.g., ifdesired.

FIGS. 8A-8B illustrate exemplary aspects of possible cell filteringtechniques that can be used in an application and service context awarecell selection process, according to some embodiments. In particular, inthe scenario of FIG. 8A, in which cell ciphering configuration is usedto filter out cells that do not meet the cell ciphering criteria for awireless device, cells A, C, and D meet the criteria, while cells B andE do not meet the criteria. In contrast, in the scenario of FIG. 8B, awireless device in the same location that uses power impactingconfiguration to filter out cells that do not meet power friendlycriteria for a wireless device, cells C, D, and E meet the criteria,while cells A and B do not meet the criteria. Thus, depending onwireless device context, different cells may be preferred in differentscenarios. Note that it is also possible that a wireless device couldhave multiple cell configuration preference criteria relating todifferent cell configuration characteristics, in which case suchfiltering could be performed sequentially (e.g., to filter out cells Band E based on cell ciphering criteria, then to also filter out cell Abased on power friendly criteria, leaving cells C and D as candidatecells for cell selection, as one possibility). Note also that other cellconfiguration preference criteria, in addition or alternatively to thecell configuration preference criteria illustrated in FIGS. 8A-8B, arealso possible.

FIGS. 9-11 illustrate exemplary aspects of a possible cell selectionprocess in which application and service context impacts cell selection,according to some embodiments. In particular, FIG. 9 illustrates aspectsof a scenario in which cell selection preference is based at least inpart on voice call quality scores for cells in the vicinity of awireless device, FIG. 10 illustrates aspects of a scenario in which cellselection preference is based at least in part on latency scores forcells in the vicinity of a wireless device, and FIG. 11 illustratesaspects of a scenario in which cell selection preference is based atleast in part on throughput scores for cells in the vicinity of awireless device.

As shown, in the scenario of FIG. 9 , baseband circuitry of a wirelessdevice may receive a service request (e.g., from an applicationprocessor of the wireless device), which may be triggered by a voicecall (e.g., phone) application. The baseband circuitry may perform cellselection to determine a cell on which to attempt to establish a radioresource control (RRC) connection for the service request. The cellselection may compare the voice call quality scores for cells in thevicinity of the wireless device, determine that cell C has a bettervoice call quality score than the current serving cell (cell A), and mayaccordingly determine to instead associate with cell C, e.g., in orderto establish the RRC connection on a cell that is likely to providebetter voice call quality.

In the scenario of FIG. 10 , baseband circuitry of a wireless device mayreceive a service request, which may be triggered by a conferencingapplication. The baseband circuitry may perform cell selection todetermine a cell on which to attempt to establish a RRC connection forthe service request. At least in some instances, low latency may beconsidered a high priority for the conferencing application, and so thecell selection may compare the latency scores for cells in the vicinityof the wireless device. Based on the comparison, the wireless device maydetermine that cell D has a better data latency score than the currentserving cell (cell A), and may accordingly determine to insteadassociate with cell D, e.g., in order to establish the RRC connection ona cell that is likely to provide better data latency.

In the scenario of FIG. 11 , baseband circuitry of a wireless device mayreceive a service request, which may be triggered by a streaming (e.g.,TV) application, an application store application, or anotherapplication for which throughput may be considered a high priority. Thebaseband circuitry may perform cell selection to determine a cell onwhich to attempt to establish a RRC connection for the service request.The cell selection may compare the throughput scores for cells in thevicinity of the wireless device. Based on the comparison, the wirelessdevice may determine that cell E has a better throughput score than thecurrent serving cell (cell A), and may accordingly determine to insteadassociate with cell E, e.g., in order to establish the RRC connection ona cell that is likely to provide better throughput.

Thus, depending on the application that triggers a service requestand/or the type of service request, a wireless device may be able tochoose a cell with which to associate that is expected to provide thebest link for the triggering application/service type.

The cell information used may include any of a variety of possiblescores, rates, flags, and/or other indicators, which may be based on anyof a variety of possible performance metrics. FIG. 12 is a tableillustrating one such set of possible scores, rates, flags, etc., thatcan be used as a basis for at least some of the techniques describedherein. Note that the illustrated set of scores, rates, and flags areprovided as examples of some such possible indicators, and that numerousother possible indicators and/or numerous variations on the providedexample indicators are also possible.

As shown, one possible indicator may include a radio access technology(RAT) type for a cell, for example among NR standalone (SA), NR nonstandalone (NSA), LTE, etc.

One possible rate may include a cell accessibility and retainabilityrate. The cell accessibility portion of the rate may contribute acertain weight (e.g., 50%) to the overall rate, and may be based on howoften random access channel (RACH) procedure failures occur on a cell.The cell retainability portion of the rate may be based on how oftenradio link failures occur on a cell and how often additional celladdition (e.g., through carrier aggregation (CA) or dual connectivity(DC)) failures occur on a cell, each of which may also contribute acertain weight (e.g., 25%) to the overall rate. At least in someembodiments, a lower accessibility and retainability failure rate may bebetter. Another possible rate may include a cell level stability rate.Such a rate may be based on how often data link stalls occur on a cell,and how often device resets occur on a cell, with each such contributingconsideration being weighted (e.g, at 50% each, as one possibility) inits contribution to the overall rate. At least in some embodiments, alower cell stability failure rate may be better.

Possible cellular link feature flags could include a power consumptionconfiguration flag, a ciphering flag, a VoPS flag, and/or a coex flag,among various possibilities. The power consumption configuration flagcould be based on whether the cell configuration includes connecteddiscontinuous reception (CDRX) enablement, e.g., indicating that thecell configuration allows UEs to sleep for power saving purposes. Theciphering flag could be based on whether the cell configuration includesciphering enablement, e.g., indicating that the cell configurationallows UEs to have secure and privacy preserving links with the cellularnetwork. The VoPS flag could be based on whether the cell is VoPS (e.g.,VoLTE and/or VoNR) capable, e.g., indicating that the cell configurationallows UEs to perform VoPS calls via the cell. The Coex flag may bebased on whether a cell operates in a spectrum portion that may besubject to coexistence considerations (e.g., which may impact cellselection depending on coexistence context for the UE) with otherwireless communication technologies. Note that such information may bevaluable to UE baseband operation, for example to support properlyinstantiating the needed software and hardware resources upfront and ina timely manner, to cope with the inference and/or link drop issues thatcould potentially result from such coexistence. Cellular link featureflags could also be provided in relation to any of various otherpossible cell characteristics, as desired.

One possible application/service aware cell score could include a cellthroughput bandwidth estimate. Such a score may be based on variousthroughput profile characteristics of a cell. For example, each of theDL throughput average, DL throughput 90th percentile, DL throughput 10thpercentile, UL throughput average, UL throughput 90th percentile, and ULthroughput 10th percentile values may be weighted in various proportions(e.g., 18%, 9%, 23%, 18%, 9%, and 23%, respectively, as one possibility)to quantify the size of the cellular throughput bandwidth of the linkwith the cell. At least in some embodiments, a higher throughputbandwidth quality score may be considered better.

Another possible application/service aware cell score could include acell latency estimate. Such a score may be based on various latencycharacteristics of a cell. For example, each of the latency average,latency 90th percentile, and latency 10th percentile may be weighted invarious proportions (e.g., 44%, 23%, and 33%, respectively, as onepossibility) to quantify the degree to which the cellular link isconsidered latency friendly. At least in some embodiments, a higherlatency quality score may be considered better.

Yet another possible application/service aware cell score could includea voice call quality score. Such a score may be based on voice callquality characteristics of a cell. For example, each of the VoPS calldrop rate and the VoPS call setup success rate may be weighted invarious proportions (e.g., 54.55% and 45.45%, respectively, as onepossibility) to quantify the quality of the cellular link when used toperform voice calls. At least in some embodiments, a higher voice callquality score may be considered better.

Note that for at least some types of cell information (e.g., certainKPIs), devices may need to be in connected mode and go through apotentially time and resource consuming measurement and controlinformation reception process to be able to obtain estimates for thesevalues. Accordingly, there may be significant potential benefit fromutilizing crowdsourced information from a relatively large number ofdevices to derive these values, e.g., in order to potentially obtain arelatively large sample size and relatively high accuracy/precision ofthe derived values, possibly with minimal or no additional samplecollection burden on any given individual device beyond the scope of itsordinary operating activity, at least in some instances.

In some embodiments, at least some cell performance information may becalculated on a per cell strength/quality region basis. For example,different RSRP/SINR regions (or per cell heat-maps) even within the samecell may be defined, and different accessibility and retainabilityfailure rates, stability failure rates, throughput bandwidth scores,latency scores, and/or voice call quality scores may be calculated for acell for each such region. These regions or heat maps can also beestimated using crowdsourced measurement data, at least according tosome embodiments. In some instances, such regions may be relativelydynamic (e.g., may change at various times, based on a device'svelocity, cell instanteous load, etc.), and may potentially be updatedas new/updated crowdsourced data becomes available. In a typicalmulti-cell scenario, to pick a cell to associate to, a device mayaccordingly measure the instantaneous actual RSRP/SINR values per celland then may compare those to the per cell region thresholds (e.g.,derived based on crowdsourced data), to decide in which RSRP/SINR regioneach cell belongs. Thus, when determining suitability for cellselection, the cell scores/rates/flags used may be specific to theRSRP/SINR region observed by the wireless device performing the cellselection.

FIG. 13 illustrates exemplary aspects of such a possible set of cellinformation that includes at least some different values for differentRSRP/SINR regions, according to some embodiments. As shown, in theillustrated scenario, three RSRP/SINR regions may be defined for a cellprovided by a cell tower. The RSRP/SINR regions may be defined bycertain threshold RSRP and/or SINR values that differentiate the regionsfrom each other, at least as one possibility. These threshold values maybe configured as desired; for the purposes of clarity in explanation,the different regions may simply be referred to herein as a “good”region, a “moderate” region, and a “bad” region. Note that differentnumbers of RSRP/SINR regions may be used, if desired. As shown, in theillustrated scenario, the accessibility and retainability failure rates,stability failure rates, and throughput bandwidth scores are differentin each different RSRP/SINR region, while the latency scores areconsistent in all three regions, and the voice call quality scores areconsistent in the good and moderate RSRP/SINR regions but different inthe bad RSRP/SINR region. Note also that at least some cellcharacteristics may not be dependent on the RSRP/SINR region, and assuch may not be calculated differently for different RSRP/SINR regions.For example, in the illustrated scenario, the network, cell identifier,cell location (coordinates), RAT, ciphering flag, power friendly flag,VoPS flag, and coexistence flag may be consistent across all RSRP/SINRregions.

FIG. 14 is a flowchart diagram illustrating exemplary aspects of apossible cell selection process that considers application and servicecontext, according to some embodiments. In the illustrated scenario, in1402, a wireless device may be in RRC idle mode with respect to cellularoperation. In 1404, a service request may be received from anapplication processor of the wireless device, and in 1406, cellinformation for surrounding cells, including cell configurationinformation and any available cell scores/rates/flags/etc. for thosecells may be obtained by cellular baseband circuitry of the wirelessdevice. In 1408, any cell without ciphering may be filtered out from thecell selection process. If all available cells have no ciphering, in1410, the cell that has the highest receive signal strength and/orquality may be selected and the wireless device may operate in a limitedservice mode, e.g., to limit potential privacy infringement from thelack of cell ciphering.

If at least some cells remain after filtering out any cells with nociphering, in 1412, cells with receive signal strength and/or quality(e.g., RSRP+SINR) below a configured threshold (“X”) may be filtered outfrom the cell selection process. If all remaining available cells havesignal strength/quality below the configured threshold, in 1414, thecell search may be stopped and the wireless device baseband operationsmay enter a sleep mode.

If at least some cells remain after filtering out any cells with receivesignal strength and/or quality below the configured threshold, one ormore checks on the battery/power consumption status of the wirelessdevice may be performed. In 1416, it may be determined whether thewireless device is charging (e.g., is connected to an external powersource) or has battery capacity/reserves above a configured threshold(“Z”). If not, in 1418, cells with certain power constraints (e.g., CDRXoff, or otherwise flagged as not power consumption friendly) may befiltered out from the cell selection process. If the wireless device isnot charging, does not have battery capacity/reserves above theconfigured threshold, and all remaining cells have power constraints(e.g., CDRX off, or otherwise flagged as not power consumptionfriendly), in 1420, a further check whether current battery drain isabove a configured threshold rate (“Y”) and battery capacity/reservesare below the configured threshold Z. If so, in 1422, the cell with thehighest receive signal and/or quality may be selected and the wirelessdevice may operate in a low data mode, e.g., to limit further batteryreserve drain.

If the wireless device is charging, or has battery capacity/reservesabove the configured threshold Z, or at least some cells remain afterfiltering out cells with power constraints, or current battery drain isnot above the configured threshold rate Y, in 1424, further filteringbased on accessibility/retainability (A/R), stability, and/orapplication/service aware scores may be performed. Such filtering mayinclude keeping up to a certain number of cells with the best A/R,stability, and application/service aware scores while discarding anyother cells from the cell selection process, filtering out cells withthe A/R, stability, and application/service aware scores that do notmeet one or more configured threshold requirements, and/or any ofvarious other filtering approaches.

After such filtering, there may be multiple possible approaches toperforming application context aware cell selection, including a firstcase and a second case. In the first case, hard application contextassignment may be performed, and the cell selection process may proceedfrom step 1424 to step 1426. In 1426, it may be determined whether theapplication context for the current service request is a voice callcontext, a low latency requirement context, or a high throughputrequired context. If the current service request is a voice callcontext, in 1428, the remaining cell with the highest voice call qualityscore may be selected. If the current service request is a low latencyrequirement context, in 1430, the remaining cell with the highestlatency score may be selected. If the current service request is a highthroughput required context, in 1432, the remaining cell with thehighest throughput bandwidth quality score may be selected.

As an alternative, in the second case, soft application contextassignment may be performed, and the cell selection process may proceedfrom step 1424 to step 1434. In 1434, the application context may bedetermined using an application score weighting approach, in whichweights may be applied to each of the voice call quality score, thethroughput bandwidth quality score, and the latency score for each cellin accordance with the relative importance of each score to theapplication or service type associated with the service request. Notethat if desired, A/R and/or stability rates can also be included in theweighted sum with their own combined or individual weighting factors. In1436, the remaining cell with the highest weighted sum of scores may beselected. Note that at least in some embodiments, the weights may beconfigured such that the sum of the weights adds to 100% (e.g.,A+B+C=100%, in the illustrated scenario of FIG. 14 ). As previouslynoted herein, the scores and rates used in the cell selection may dependon the measured RSRP/SINR for each cell under consideration, at least insome embodiments.

It should be noted that, additionally or alternatively to using detailedcell performance and configuration information forapplication/service/device context aware cell selection, suchinformation can be used for any of various other purposes. As one suchpossibility, the baseband resource controller (e.g., the access tratumradio resource controller (AS-RRC) of a wireless device may use derivedcell scores, rates, and flags, in conjunction with the device'sgeo-location and velocity estimates, to determine when the device isapproaching locations with potentially problematic cellular behavior(e.g., tunnels, known areas with bad coverage, etc., for whichscore/rate values may provide an indication) and act proactively toavoid dropping the cellular link and/or recovering cellular service morequickly if dropping the cellular link cannot be avoided.

Such AS-RRC proactive actions could include increasing the rate at whichcellular measurements are performed, e.g., to increase the chance offinding a good cell to move to, in case the serving cell conditions aredegrading and scores/rates of nearby cells are as good or better thanthe current serving cell. Another possible action could includetriggering single shot measurements on a given frequency before tryingto reselect or be handed over to its corresponding cell. This may helpmake the cell association process more robust against noisy measurementsthat result in a “ghost cell” effect, where a device detects a cell whenthere is actually no real cell, thus helping to reduce or avoid thepossibility of re-selection/handover ping-pong scenarios. Yet anotherpossible action could include applying some general or cell specificoffsets for the re-selection/handover criteria depending on the scores,to fulfill QoS application needs when scores of surrounding cells are asgood as or better than the serving cell score. Still another possibleaction could include determining not to reselect to a cell if it doesnot support certain features, such as if VoPS is not supported and theAP side service request is triggered by a voice application. Such actionmay prevent the device from needing to perform a potentially time andresource consuming evolved packet service (EPS) fallback beforeestablishing the voice call, which could affect the overall end userperceived call quality. Note that any of various other such proactiveactions (e.g., performed by the AS-RRC and/or other device entities)based on cell performance and configuration information, devicegeo-location, device velocity, and/or other considerations are alsopossible.

In the following further exemplary embodiments are provided.

One set of embodiments may include an apparatus, comprising: a processorconfigured to cause a wireless device to: determine a current locationof the wireless device; determine one or more cells associated with thecurrent location of the wireless device; determine application contextbased metric information for the one or more cells associated with thecurrent location of the wireless device; and determine a cell with whichto associate from the one or more cells associated with the currentlocation of the wireless device based at least in part on theapplication context based metric information for the one or more cellsassociated with the current location of the wireless device.

According to some embodiments, the application context based metricinformation for the one or more cells associated with the currentlocation of the wireless device is determined based at least in part onone or more of aggregated crowdsourced data or historical cellperformance measurements performed by the wireless device.

According to some embodiments, the processor is further configured tocause the wireless device to: receive a service request from anapplication executing on the wireless device; and determine anapplication type of the application from which the service request isreceived, wherein the cell with which to associate is determined furtherbased at least in part on the application type of the application fromwhich the service request is received.

According to some embodiments, the application context based metricinformation for the one or more cells associated with the currentlocation of the wireless device is determined based at least in part onone or more signal strength measurements or signal quality measurementsfor the one or more cells associated with the current location of thewireless device.

According to some embodiments, the processor is further configured tocause the wireless device to: determine one or more cell characteristicsor expected cell performance information for the one or more cellsassociated with the current location of the wireless device based atleast in part on one or more of aggregated crowdsourced data orhistorical cell performance measurements performed by the wirelessdevice.

According to some embodiments, the one or more cell characteristics orexpected cell performance information include information for one ormore of: a power consumption configuration metric; a ciphering supportmetric; a voice over packet switched (VoPS) support metric; a cellaccessibility metric; a cell retainability metric; or a cell stabilitymetric.

According to some embodiments, the application context based metricinformation includes information for one or more of: a cell throughputmetric; a cell latency metric; or a cell voice call quality metric.

Another set of embodiments may include a wireless device, comprising: anantenna; a radio operably coupled to the antenna; and a processoroperably coupled to the radio; wherein the wireless device is configuredto: determine a current location of the wireless device; determine oneor more cells associated with the current location of the wirelessdevice; determine cell performance information for one or moreapplication context based metrics for each of the one or more cellsassociated with the current location of the wireless device; anddetermine a cell with which to associate from the one or more cellsassociated with the current location of the wireless device based atleast in part on the cell performance information for the one or moreapplication context based metrics for each of the one or more cellsassociated with the current location of the wireless device.

According to some embodiments, the cell performance information for atleast one cell of the one or more cells associated with the currentlocation of the wireless device is determined based at least in part onhistorical cell performance between the wireless device and the at leastone cell.

According to some embodiments, the cell performance information for atleast one cell of the one or more cells associated with the currentlocation of the wireless device is determined based at least in part onaggregated crowdsourced data.

According to some embodiments, the wireless device is further configuredto: receive aggregated crowdsourced data indicating cell performanceinformation for the one or more application context based metrics for aplurality of cells, wherein the plurality of cells include the at leastone cell of the one or more cells associated with the current locationof the wireless device.

According to some embodiments, the cell performance information for theone or more application context based metrics for each of the one ormore cells associated with the current location of the wireless deviceis determined based at least in part on one or more signal strengthmeasurements or signal quality measurements for each of the one or morecells associated with the current location of the wireless device.

According to some embodiments, the one or more application context basedmetrics include one or more of: a cell throughput metric; a cell latencymetric; or a cell voice call quality metric.

Yet another set of embodiments may include a method, comprising: by awireless device: determining a current location of the wireless device;determining one or more cells associated with the current location ofthe wireless device; determining one or more cell characteristics forthe one or more cells associated with the current location of thewireless device based at least in part on aggregated crowdsourced datafor the one or more cells associated with the current location of thewireless device, wherein the one or more cell characteristics for theone or more cells associated with the current location of the wirelessdevice include at least one application context based metric; anddetermining a cell with which to associate from the one or more cellsassociated with the current location of the wireless device based atleast in part on the one or more cell characteristics for the one ormore cells associated with the current location of the wireless device.

According to some embodiments, determining the cell with which toassociate from the one or more cells associated with the currentlocation of the wireless device is further based at least in part on oneor more wireless device context characteristics for the wireless device.

According to some embodiments, the one or more wireless device contextcharacteristics include one or more of: whether the wireless device iscurrently charging; a current battery reserve level of the wirelessdevice; a current power consumption mode of the wireless device; or acurrent battery drain rate of the wireless device.

According to some embodiments, determining the cell with which toassociate from the one or more cells associated with the currentlocation of the wireless device is further based at least in part onapplication context information for the wireless device.

According to some embodiments, the application context information forthe wireless device includes prioritization information for one or moreof throughput, latency, or voice call quality for one or moreapplications active at the wireless device.

According to some embodiments, at least a subset of the one or more cellcharacteristics for the one or more cells associated with the currentlocation of the wireless device are determined based at least in part onone or more signal strength measurements or signal quality measurementsfor the one or more cells associated with the current location of thewireless device.

According to some embodiments, the one or more cell characteristicsinclude one or more of: a cell accessibility metric; a cellretainability metric; a cell stability metric; a power consumptionconfiguration metric; a ciphering support metric; a voice over packetswitched (VoPS) support metric; a cell throughput metric; a cell latencymetric; or a cell voice call quality metric.

A further exemplary embodiment may include a method, comprising:performing, by a wireless device, any or all parts of the precedingexamples.

Another exemplary embodiment may include a device, comprising: anantenna; a radio coupled to the antenna; and a processing elementoperably coupled to the radio, wherein the device is configured toimplement any or all parts of the preceding examples.

A further exemplary set of embodiments may include a non-transitorycomputer accessible memory medium comprising program instructions which,when executed at a device, cause the device to implement any or allparts of any of the preceding examples.

A still further exemplary set of embodiments may include a computerprogram comprising instructions for performing any or all parts of anyof the preceding examples.

Yet another exemplary set of embodiments may include an apparatuscomprising means for performing any or all of the elements of any of thepreceding examples.

Still another exemplary set of embodiments may include an apparatuscomprising a processing element configured to cause a wireless device toperform any or all of the elements of any of the preceding examples.

It is well understood that the use of personally identifiableinformation should follow privacy policies and practices that aregenerally recognized as meeting or exceeding industry or governmentalrequirements for maintaining the privacy of users. In particular,personally identifiable information data should be managed and handledso as to minimize risks of unintentional or unauthorized access or use,and the nature of authorized use should be clearly indicated to users.

Any of the methods described herein for operating a user equipment (UE)may be the basis of a corresponding method for operating a base station,by interpreting each message/signal X received by the UE in the downlinkas message/signal X transmitted by the base station, and eachmessage/signal Y transmitted in the uplink by the UE as a message/signalY received by the base station.

Embodiments of the present disclosure may be realized in any of variousforms. For example, in some embodiments, the present subject matter maybe realized as a computer-implemented method, a computer-readable memorymedium, or a computer system. In other embodiments, the present subjectmatter may be realized using one or more custom-designed hardwaredevices such as ASICs. In other embodiments, the present subject mattermay be realized using one or more programmable hardware elements such asFPGAs.

In some embodiments, a non-transitory computer-readable memory medium(e.g., a non-transitory memory element) may be configured so that itstores program instructions and/or data, where the program instructions,if executed by a computer system, cause the computer system to perform amethod, e.g., any of a method embodiments described herein, or, anycombination of the method embodiments described herein, or, any subsetof any of the method embodiments described herein, or, any combinationof such subsets.

In some embodiments, a device (e.g., a UE) may be configured to includea processor (or a set of processors) and a memory medium (or memoryelement), where the memory medium stores program instructions, where theprocessor is configured to read and execute the program instructionsfrom the memory medium, where the program instructions are executable toimplement any of the various method embodiments described herein (or,any combination of the method embodiments described herein, or, anysubset of any of the method embodiments described herein, or, anycombination of such subsets). The device may be realized in any ofvarious forms.

Although the embodiments above have been described in considerabledetail, numerous variations and modifications will become apparent tothose skilled in the art once the above disclosure is fully appreciated.It is intended that the following claims be interpreted to embrace allsuch variations and modifications.

The invention claimed is:
 1. An apparatus, comprising: a processorconfigured to cause a wireless device to: determine a current locationof the wireless device; select, based on execution of an application onthe wireless device, an application context related cell characteristicto prioritize for selection of a target cell with which to connect;determine a first cell and a second cell associated with the currentlocation of the wireless device; determine respective values of theapplication context related cell characteristic for the first cell andthe second cell associated with the current location of the wirelessdevice; select the target cell with which to connect from the first cellor the second cell based at least in part on the respective values ofthe application context related cell characteristic for the first celland the second cell associated with the current location of the wirelessdevice; and connect to a cellular network using the target cell.
 2. Theapparatus of claim 1, wherein the respective values of the applicationcontext related cell characteristic for the first cell and the secondcell associated with the current location of the wireless device aredetermined based at least in part on one or more of aggregatedcrowdsourced data or historical cell performance measurements performedby the wireless device.
 3. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein theprocessor is further configured to cause the wireless device to: receivea service request from the application; and determine an applicationtype of the application, wherein the target cell is selected furtherbased at least in part on the application type of the application. 4.The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the respective values of theapplication context related cell characteristic for the first cell andthe second cell associated with the current location of the wirelessdevice are determined based at least in part on one or more signalstrength measurements or signal quality measurements for the first celland the second cell associated with the current location of the wirelessdevice.
 5. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the processor is furtherconfigured to cause the wireless device to: determine expected cellperformance information for the first cell and the second cellassociated with the current location of the wireless device based atleast in part on one or more of aggregated crowdsourced data orhistorical cell performance measurements performed by the wirelessdevice.
 6. The apparatus of claim 5, wherein the expected cellperformance information include information for one or more of: a powerconsumption configuration metric; a ciphering support metric; a voiceover packet switched (VoPS) support metric; a cell accessibility metric;a cell retainability metric; or a cell stability metric.
 7. Theapparatus of claim 1, wherein the respective values of the applicationcontext related cell characteristic include information for one or moreof: a cell throughput metric; a cell latency metric; or a cell voicecall quality metric.
 8. A wireless device, comprising: a radio; and aprocessor operably coupled to the radio and configured to cause thewireless device to: determine a current location of the wireless device;select, based on execution of an application on the wireless device, anapplication context related cell characteristic to prioritize forselection of a target cell with which to connect; determine a first celland a second cell associated with the current location of the wirelessdevice; determine respective values of the application context relatedcell characteristic for the first cell and the second cell associatedwith the current location of the wireless device; select the target cellwith which to connect from the first cell or the second cell based atleast in part on the respective values of the application contextrelated cell characteristic for the first cell and the second cellassociated with the current location of the wireless device; and connectto a cellular network using the target cell.
 9. The wireless device ofclaim 8, wherein the respective values of the application contextrelated cell characteristic for the first cell and the second cellassociated with the current location of the wireless device aredetermined based at least in part on one or more of aggregatedcrowdsourced data or historical cell performance measurements performedby the wireless device.
 10. The wireless device of claim 8, wherein theprocessor is further configured to cause the wireless device to: receivea service request from the application; and determine an applicationtype of the application, wherein the target cell is selected furtherbased at least in part on the application type of the application. 11.The wireless device of claim 8, wherein the respective values of theapplication context related cell characteristic for the first cell andthe second cell associated with the current location of the wirelessdevice are determined based at least in part on one or more signalstrength measurements or signal quality measurements for the first celland the second cell associated with the current location of the wirelessdevice.
 12. The wireless device of claim 8, wherein the processor isfurther configured to cause the wireless device to: determine one ormore cell characteristics or expected cell performance information forthe first cell and the second cell associated with the current locationof the wireless device based at least in part on one or more ofaggregated crowdsourced data or historical cell performance measurementsperformed by the wireless device.
 13. The wireless device of claim 12,wherein the one or more cell characteristics or expected cellperformance information include information for one or more of: a powerconsumption configuration metric; a ciphering support metric; a voiceover packet switched (VoPS) support metric; a cell accessibility metric;a cell retainability metric; or a cell stability metric.
 14. Thewireless device of claim 8, wherein the respective values of theapplication context related cell characteristic includes information forone or more of: a cell throughput metric; a cell latency metric; or acell voice call quality metric.
 15. A method, comprising: determining acurrent location of a wireless device; selecting, based on execution ofan application on the wireless device, an application context relatedcell characteristic to prioritize for selection of a target cell withwhich to connect; determining a first cell and a second cell associatedwith the current location of the wireless device; determining respectivevalues of the application context related cell characteristic for thefirst cell and the second cell associated with the current location ofthe wireless device; selecting the target cell with which to connectfrom the first cell or the second cell based at least in part on therespective values of the application context related cell characteristicfor the first cell and the second cell associated with the currentlocation of the wireless device; and connecting to a cellular networkusing the target cell.
 16. The method of claim 15, wherein therespective values of the application context related cell characteristicfor the first cell and the second cell associated with the currentlocation of the wireless device are determined based at least in part onone or more of aggregated crowdsourced data or historical cellperformance measurements performed by the wireless device.
 17. Themethod of claim 15, further comprising: receiving a service request fromthe application; and determining an application type of the application,wherein the target cell is selected further based at least in part onthe application type of the application.
 18. The method of claim 15,wherein the respective values of the application context related cellcharacteristic for the first cell and the second cell associated withthe current location of the wireless device are determined based atleast in part on one or more signal strength measurements or signalquality measurements for the first cell and the second cell associatedwith the current location of the wireless device.
 19. The method ofclaim 15, further comprising: determining one or more cellcharacteristics or expected cell performance information for the firstcell and the second cell associated with the current location of thewireless device based at least in part on one or more of aggregatedcrowdsourced data or historical cell performance measurements performedby the wireless device.
 20. The method of claim 15, wherein therespective values of the application context related cell characteristicincludes information for one or more of: a cell throughput metric; acell latency metric; or a cell voice call quality metric.